OEM FORD DIAGNOSTIC TOOL CODE
We are dealing with ordinary OBD II codes that illuminate "MIL" lamps, which only happens when OBD II codes that have the potential to affect exhaust emissions are set and stored, which brings us to- SAE Standard J2012: Diagnostic Trouble Code Definitions The above encapsulates the main differences between the capabilities of factory scan tools and generic scan tools, but in this article, we are not dealing with proprietary service information. In practice, this often means that even if you are prepared to pay for OEM service information/programming, the generic scan tool you have may a) not be able to accept the download, and/or b), be incompatible with one or more communications protocols in use on the vehicle.
Moreover, while some types or classes of OEM captive service information can be obtained via expensive subscriptions to third-party sources, many cheap generic scan tools are limited in the number of communication protocols they support. These types of technical/service information are commonly referred to as “captive technology” or “captive information” and in some markets, such as Australia (among others), this information is shared with neither the independent repair industry nor with manufacturers of scan tools that have a presence in these markets.
OEM FORD DIAGNOSTIC TOOL DRIVER
However, if you are new to OBD II diagnostics, you may not be aware that this is because many control, monitoring, and/or calibration thresholds for systems like ADAS (Advanced Driver Assist Systems) and others are based on proprietary algorithms and look-up tables that car manufacturers are not obliged to share with manufacturers of generic scan tools. If you are an experienced diagnostician, you will no doubt know that many diagnostic, programming and calibration jobs on many new vehicles can only be performed with factory scan tools. Let us start with stating- The differences between factory and generic scan tools In this article, we will take a closer look at this misconception, and attempt to illustrate that generic scan tools are often just as effective in diagnosing “MIL” issues as factory scan tools are. We’ll gloss over the details of who said what to whom when the owner of the workshop was made aware of the situation, but suffice to say that the conversation highlighted a common misconception among many young technicians- a misconception that states that factory scan tools are always better at diagnosing “MIL” aka, “CHECK ENGINE” issues than generic scan tools. The conversation went round in circles for a while until the vehicle’s owner intervened by thanking everybody involved for their time, but since the workshop seemed to have neither the time nor the equipment to help him, he’d take his vehicle to a dealership instead. The service writer wanted the technician to fit the job into his schedule for the day, but the technician demurred because the workshop did not have a Ford-specific scan tool. The conversation involved a late model Ford Ranger with an illuminated MIL lamp and some minor power loss issues. During a recent consultation about an ECU reprogramming issue with an erstwhile competitor, this writer was privy to a conversation between a young technician and a service writer/advisor at the competitor’s premises.